Who Benefited the Most? Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Intervention Against Cognitive Decline in Older Women and Men - Secondary Analysis of the AgeWell.de-trial.

INTRODUCTION: Differences between women and men matter in the prevalence and risk factors of dementia. We aimed to examine potential sex differences regarding the effectiveness by running a secondary analysis of the AgeWell.de trial, a cluster-randomized multicenter multi-domain lifestyle intervention to reduce cognitive decline. METHODS: Intention-to-treat analyses of women (n=433) and men (n=386) aged 60 to 77 years were used for models including interactions between intervention group allocation and sex followed by subgroup analysis stratified by sex on primary and secondary outcomes. Further, the same procedure was repeated for age groups (60-69 vs. 70-77) within sex-specific subgroups to assess the effectiveness in different age groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (ref. number: DRKS00013555). RESULTS: No differences were found between women and men in the effectiveness of the intervention on cognitive performance. However, women benefitted from the intervention regarding depressive symptoms while men did not. Health-related quality of life was enhanced for younger intervention participants (60-69 years) in both women and men. CONCLUSION: The AgeWell.de intervention was able to improve depressive symptoms in women and health-related quality of life in younger participants. Female participants between 60 and 69 years benefited the most. Results support the need of better individually targeted lifestyle interventions for older adults.

[Pharmacokinetics of gadolinium-based contrast agents]. / Pharmakokinetik von gadoliniumhaltigen Kontrastmitteln.

BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-based contrast agents are used routinely in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They can be detected over a long period of time in some tissues (skin, brain, bone). OBJECTIVES: What is known on the pharmacokinetics of gadolinium-based contrast agents and on gadolinium deposition in various tissues? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fundamental research and expert recommendations are discussed. RESULTS: Gadolinium-based contrast agents are distributed rapidly within the body and are eliminated by the kidneys. A fast initial elimination (half-life approximately 2 h) is followed by a slow elimination phase (half-life approximately 6 days), reflecting slow release from tissues. Deposition in the brain was observed mainly after administration of linear, non-ionic contrast agents. Whether gadolinium deposition in tissues consists of chelated or free gadolinium and whether otherwise healthy subjects are affected to a similar extent, is unclear. Currently, there are no proven risks associated with gadolinium deposition in the brain. CONCLUSIONS: Risks and benefits should be considered on an individual basis before MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agents (expected benefit, potentially undetected risks, available alternatives and their risks). Quantification of gadolinium in urine or blood from patients is not meaningful and should not be done outside clinical studies.

[Regional citrate anticoagulation in renal replacement therapy in the intensive care station : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI]. / Regionale Zitratantikoagulation bei Nierenersatzverfahren auf der Intensivstation : Empfehlungen der Sektionen Niere der DGIIN, ÖGIAIN und DIVI.

BACKGROUND: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in continuous renal replacement therapy can effectively anticoagulate dialysis circuits without having adverse effects on systemic heparin application. In particular, in continuous renal replacement therapy RCA is well established and represents a safe procedure with longer filter lifetimes and fewer bleeding complications. OBJECTIVES: To provide guidance on the indications, advantages and disadvantages, and use of RCA, current recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin), ÖGIAIN (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) and DIVI (Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) are stated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recommendations in this paper are based on the current KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines, other published guidelines and protocols as well as the expert knowledge and clinical experience of the authors. RESULTS: The use of commercially available machines with coupled pumps and integrated safety features, effective personal training and standardized protocols for clinical usage (SOP) is particularly important for the safe clinical use of RCA in renal replacement therapy. Contrary to previous recommendations, even liver failure or shock with lactic acidosis may no longer be an absolute contra-indication for RCA. However, these particular patients have to be carefully monitored for signs of citrate accumulation.

[Prevention of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI]. / Prävention der akuten Nierenschädigung beim kritisch kranken Patienten : Empfehlungen der Sektionen Niere der DGIIN, ÖGIAIN und DIVI.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has both high mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To prevent the occurrence of AKI, current recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin), ÖGIAIN (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) and DIVI (Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) are stated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recommendations stated in this paper are based on the current Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, the published statements of the "Working Group on Prevention, AKI section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine" and the expert knowledge and clinical experience of the authors. RESULTS: Currently there are no approved clinically effective drugs for the prevention of AKI. Therefore the mainstay of prevention is the optimization of renal perfusion by improving the mean arterial pressure (>65 mm Hg, higher target may be considered in hypertensive patients). This can be done by vasopressors, preferably norepinephrine and achieving or maintaining euvolemia. Hyperhydration that can lead to AKI itself should be avoided. In patients with maintained diuresis this can be done by diuretics that are per se no preventive drug for AKI. Radiocontrast enhanced imaging should not be withheld from patients at risk for AKI; if indicated, however, the contrast media should be limited to the smallest possible volume.

[Extracorporeal renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI]. / Extrakorporale Nierenersatztherapie bei akuter Nierenschädigung : Empfehlungen der Sektionen "Niere" der DGIIN, ÖGIAIN und DIVI.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The incidence of AKI in ICU patients exceeds 50% and the associated morbidity and mortality rates increase with severity of AKI. In addition, long-term consequences of AKI are underestimated and several studies show impaired long-term outcome after AKI. In about 5-25% of ICU patients with AKI renal replacement therapy (RRT) is required. OBJECTIVES: To assist in indication, timing, modality and application of renal replacement therapy of adult patients, current recommendations from the renal sections of the DGIIN (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin), ÖGIAIN (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) and DIVI (Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) are stated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recommendations stated in this paper are based on the current KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines, recommendations from the 17th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Consensus Group, the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) with the French Society of Anesthesia Intensive Care (SFAR) and the expert knowledge and clinical experience of the authors. RESULTS: Today, different treatment modalities for RRT are available. Although continuous RRT and intermittent dialysis therapy as well as continuous dialysis therapy have comparable outcomes, differences exist with respect to practical application as well as health-economic aspects. Individualized risk stratification might be helpful to choose the right time to start and the right treatment modality for patients.

[Dose adjustment of anti-infective drugs in patients with renal failure and renal replacement therapy in intensive care medicine : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI]. / Dosierung von Antiinfektiva bei Nierenversagen und Nierenersatztherapie in der Intensivmedizin : Empfehlungen der Sektionen Niere der DGIIN, ÖGIAIN und DIVI.

BACKGROUND: Many anti-infective drugs require dose adjustments in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy, in order to achieve adequate therapeutic drug concentrations. OBJECTIVES: The fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of drug dose adjustment are presented. Recommendations on anti-infective drug dosage in intensive care are provided. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We established dose recommendations of selected anti-infective drugs based on information in the summary of product characteristics, published studies and recommendations, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, and the experience and expert opinion of the authors. RESULTS: Out of a total of 37 anti-infective drugs (31 antibiotics, 2 antivirals, 4 antifungals) 8 can be administered independent of renal function. For 29 anti-infective drugs, a specific recommendation on drug dosage could be made in case of intermittent hemodialysis and for 24 anti-infective drugs in case of continuous hemo(dia)filtration. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations on dosing of important anti-infective drugs in critically ill patients with AKI and renal replacement therapy are provided.

Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in paediatrics: age-related regulation and response to mycophenolic acid.

PURPOSE: Since many drug targets and metabolizing enzymes are developmentally regulated, we investigated a potential comparable regulation of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity that has recently been advocated as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of mycophenolic acid (MPA) effects in the paediatric population. Since the field of pharmacodynamic monitoring of MPA is evolving, we also analyzed the response of IMPDH activity on MPA in children vs adolescents after renal transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed IMPDH activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in 79 healthy children aged 2.0-17.9 years in comparison to 106 healthy adults. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of MPA and IMPDH over 6 or 12 h after mycophenolate mofetil dosing were performed in 17 paediatric renal transplant recipients. IMPDH activity was measured by HPLC and normalized to the adenosine monophosphate (AMP) content of the cells, MPA plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. RESULTS: Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity displayed a high inter-individual variability (coefficient of variation 40.2%) throughout the entire age range studied. Median IMPDH did not differ significantly in healthy pre-school children (82 [range, 42-184] µmol/s/mol AMP), school-age children (61 [30-153]), adolescents (83 [43-154]) and healthy adults (83 [26-215]). Similar to adults, IMPDH activity in children and adolescents was inversely correlated with MPA plasma concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our data do not show a pronounced developmental regulation of IMPDH activity in PBMCs in the paediatric population and there is a comparable inhibition of IMPDH activity by MPA in children and adolescents after renal transplantation.

[Drug interactions]. / Arzneimittelinteraktionen.

Drug-drug interactions can be used to enhance effectiveness but they are also a significant cause of adverse drug reactions. Alterations in liberation, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion may all affect the pharmacokinetics of a drug. Cytochrome P450 enzymes and drug transporters like ABC-transporters determine the clearance of many drugs leading to alterations in therapeutic effect. In contrast pharmacodynamic drug interactions will alter drug effects in the absence of concentration changes of the co-administered drug. Alterations of a drug effect may require changes in dose to maintain the therapeutic effect.

Single daily dose of cyclosporine in patients with primary glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome.

AIMS: Single daily dose cyclosporine (SDD-CsA) might be a new option providing comparable efficacy, increased compliance and less nephrotoxicity compared to standard twice-daily dose cyclosporine (TDD-CsA). The aim of this trial was to prove the feasibility of SDD-CsA as primary and secondary maintenance therapy in patients with nephrotic syndrome. METHODS: We treated 25 adult patients with nephrotic syndrome and chronic primary glomerulonephropathy with SDD-CsA for a period of 12 months or more. 12 patients were pre-treated with twice-daily dose cyclosporine (TDD-CsA) and were then switched secondarily to a single daily dose after a median period of 8 months (sSDD-CsA). 13 patients were treated primarily with single daily dose cyclosporine (pSDD-CsA). RESULTS: In primary SDD-CsA patients, proteinuria decreased significantly from 9.2 - 0.8 g/l (p = 0.02) and serum protein increased significantly from 54 - 71 g/l (p = 0.03) during the study period. In secondary SDD-CsA patients, serum protein increased further (64 - 69, p = 0.04) after switching to SDD-CsA. In secondary SDD-CsA patients, the median total daily CsA dose was significantly lower (200 mg) with SDD-CsA compared to previous twice-daily dosing (300 mg, p = 0.01). Serum creatinine did not differ significantly before and after therapy and between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: SDD-CsA is effective in patients with nephrotic syndrome as primary and secondary maintenance therapy. SDD-CsA allows for significantly lower total daily doses, probably with less nephrotoxicity.

Pharmacodynamic dose adjustment in renal failure: importance of the Hill coefficient.

OBJECTIVE: The most commonly applied pharmacodynamic model is the sigmoid E(max) model which can be applied for evaluation of dose adjustment schemes in renal failure. It is not known whether the Hill coefficient (H) is a shape factor that only improves the mathematical fit or whether the Hill coefficient is a pharmacodynamic parameter that independently affects drug effects and drug dosage adjustment. METHODS: We performed simulations applying a mechanism-based mathematical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for antimicrobial drugs. For the case of renal failure, two dose adjustment rules were evaluated. RESULTS: Administering the drug as 3 dose fractions per day increased the predicted total effect in the case of H = 1 but decreased the predicted total effect in the case of H = 2 compared to once-daily dosing. In renal failure, administration of the normal dose and prolongation of the interval leads to an increased total effect for the simulated drugs for both cases, namely H = 1 and H = 2. However, reducing the dose in renal failure might produce underdosage for a drug with a high Hill coefficient. CONCLUSION: The predicted effects of once- versus thrice-daily dose fractions as well as the predicted effects of dose reduction versus interval prolongation in renal failure critically depend on the Hill coefficient. Methods to estimate the Hill coefficient more precisely should be explored.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin pulse therapy in patients with progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a long-term follow-up.

In progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment has been used to delay disease progression, but the long-term efficacy is largely unknown. We report the clinical outcomes after IVIg therapy in six male patients with progressive IgAN [median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)] followed for a median observation period of 8 years. In this single-arm, non-randomized study, IVIg was given monthly at a dose of 2 g/kg body weight for 6 months. The course of renal function was assessed by linear regression analysis of GFR and proteinuria, and was compared to eight patients with IgAN (median GFR 29 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) without IVIg as a contemporaneous control group. IgAN disease progression was delayed after IVIg therapy on average for 3 years. The mean loss of renal function decreased from -1.05 ml/min per month to -0.15 ml/min per month (P = 0.024) and proteinuria decreased from 2.4 g/l to 1.0 g/l (P = 0.015). The primary end-point (GFR < 10 ml/min or relapse) occurred 5.2 years (median; range 0.4-8.8) after the first IVIg pulse, and after 1.3 years (median; range 0.8-2.4) in the control group (P = 0.043). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median renal survival time with IVIg was prolonged by 3.5 years (IVIg 4.7 years versus control 1.2 years; P = 0.006). IVIg pulse therapy may be considered as a treatment option to reduce the loss of renal function and improve proteinuria in patients with progressive IgAN.

Determination of the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin when administered in combination with sirolimus and cyclosporin A in patients with kidney transplant, and review of the relevant literature.

OBJECTIVE: Therapy of elevated cholesterol serum concentrations is often necessary in patients with kidney transplants. However, the pharmacokinetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors when administered in combination with sirolimus and cyclosporin A (CsA) have not been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin when administered in combination with sirolimus in patients with kidney transplants, and to review the literature with regard to the differences in pharmacological behavior between sirolimus, CsA and tacrolimus. METHODS: Patients (n = 7) with a stable and functioning kidney transplant and elevated LDL cholesterol serum concentrations were included in the study. After an observation period of 3 months, and whilst receiving sirolimus and CsA, cerivastatin (0.2 mg daily) was administered for a period of 3 months. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated on Day 1 and 3 months after initiation of cerivastatin therapy. Routine laboratory parameters and clinical adverse events were monitored throughout the study period. RESULTS: Single-dose cerivastatin AUC was 2 to 3-fold higher in comparison to published values obtained in healthy subjects. The accumulation ratio of cerivastatin (after 3 months/ Day 1) was 1.6. Sirolimus and CsA trough levels, and the sirolimus AUC did not differ after single dose and multiple doses of cerivastatin. CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy of cerivastatin with sirolimus and CsA leads to a significant increase in cerivastatin exposure. Additional drug monitoring of sirolimus and CsA is not necessary.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lispro-insulin in hemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: Lispro-insulin, after subcutaneous injection in patients with normal renal function, is absorbed faster and has a faster onset of action when compared to regular insulin. However, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lispro-insulin in renal failure have not yet been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients with diabetes mellitus on long-term hemodialysis received an individualized dose of regular insulin or lispro-insulin in a crossover design. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were measured before and after the subcutaneous insulin injections. RESULTS: Plasma insulin concentrations increased faster (time of maximum concentration tmax 20 vs 40 minutes, p = 0.01) and were higher (standardized maximum concentration Cmax/D 13.6 vs 6.1 microU/ml/U, p = 0.01) after lispro-insulin compared to regular insulin. The area under the curve, clearance and parameters of the hypoglycemic action for the 2 insulin products did not differ significantly, but there was a trend to minimum blood glucose level (time of the blood glucose minimum, Gtmin) to occur earlier with lispro-insulin (120 vs 210 minutes, p > 0.05). Differences in elimination half-life and volume of distribution were explained by flip-flop pharmacokinetics in the case of regular insulin. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus, lispro-insulin is absorbed faster than regular insulin. Differences in the effects of lispro-and regular insulin can be explained by the differences in pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methylprednisolone after one bolus dose compared with two dose fractions.

OBJECTIVE: Although the elimination half-life of most glucocorticoids is short, they are usually administered once daily, or even on alternate days. Our hypothesis was that this practice might compromise the immunosuppressive effect of those drugs during the second part of the administration interval. METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive intravenous methylprednisolone either 32 mg in the morning, or 16 mg in the morning and 16 mg in the evening in a cross-over design. Methylprednisolone concentrations were determined in plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The total number of CD3+ lymphocytes, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subpopulations was measured in blood. The suppression of these cells was used as a surrogate parameter for the immunosuppressive response, and expressed as reduction of the area under the effect time curve (AUETC). Possible adverse effects on blood pressure, glucose, insulin, and endogenous cortisol levels were monitored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in methylprednisolone half-life (2.2 +/- 0.4 h), clearance (575 +/- 113 mL/min), volume of distribution (106 +/- 22 l), concentration producing the half-maximum effect on CD4+ T-cells (1.5 +/- 0.7 ng/mL), and Hill-coefficient (1.2 +/- 0.1), after single or divided dose. However, the total 24 h effect area (AUETC) of lymphocytes, and mainly CD4+ T-cells was significantly more suppressed (P = 0.008) with the divided dosage regimen than after the single dose (8422 +/- 2163 vs. 11,545 +/- 3020 h cells/microL). The surrogate markers for adverse events were not different, except for cortisol. CONCLUSION: Within a 24-h interval, two dose fractions of methylprednisolone produce a stronger and more sustained immunosuppressive response than one single bolus dose.

PK-PD curve-fitting problems with the Hill equation? Try one of the 1-exp functions derived from Hodgkin, Douglas or Gompertz.

UNLABELLED: Non-linear phenomena are observed with enzyme kinetics, protein binding, pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. The Hill equation, the Michaelis-Menten equation extended by a power coefficient, is traditionally used for sigmoid curve fitting. Sigmoid saturation phenomena can also be described by exponential functions (1-exp), extended by a power coefficient such as those derived by Hodgkin, Douglas or Gompertz. Comparing the 4 equations, the sigmoid 1-exp function in the form of Hodgkin and Huxley comes closest to the principle of simplicity and succinctness with regard to definition, slope and flexibility of the inflection point. To compare the applicability, a standardized sample of 250 curves was generated by each I of the 4 equations and mutually fitted with the remaining 3. The Hill equation gives the closest fit with the data generated by the other functions. The Douglas variant exhibits the highest rate of convergence. The Gompertz function provides the basic feature of a baseline effect. CONCLUSION: The sigmoid functions investigated (Hill, Hodgkin, Douglas, Gompertz) have differing characteristics and can be used interchangeably for solving specific problems in non-linear modeling.

Renal proximal tubular cell growth and differentiation are differentially modulated by renotropic growth factors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The renotropic growth factors (GFs), hepatocyte GF (HGF), epidermal GF (EGF), and insulin-like GF-I (IGF-I) accelerate renal regeneration in animal models after toxic or ischemic injury. These GFs initiate their biological effects on renal tubular cells by interaction with specific transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the proximal tubular cell line PT-1, the biological effects of HGF, EGF, and IGF-I and the growth-inhibitory effects of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were investigated. Receptor binding and tyrosine kinase phosphorylation were determined by ligand binding studies and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: HGF, EGF, and IGF-I bound with nanomolar affinity to their specific cell membrane receptor tyrosine kinases. In contrast to EGF or IGF-I, HGF induced a variety of cell morphological changes, including cell scattering, formation of tubular structures, and expression of long microvilli on the apical cell membrane. HGF was a 10-fold more potent and more effective growth promoter than EGF or IGF-I. Among the TKIs tested, the mitogenic effect of HGF could be more specifically inhibited by emodin and tyrphostin, that of EGF by methyl-2,5-dihydroxycinnamate, lavendustin A, and genistein, and that of IGF-I by geldanamycin. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to EGF and IGF-I, HGF stimulated both growth and differentiation of renal proximal tubular cells, demonstrating the amazing biological potency of this renotropic growth factor. Selective TKIs may be a promising approach to modulate diseases with abnormalities in protein kinase signalling pathways such as renal cell carcinoma.

A concept for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dosage adjustment in renal impairment: the case of aminoglycosides.

BACKGROUND: For patients with impaired renal function, dosage adjustment is necessary for many drugs. Adjustment with respect only to pharmacokinetic parameters may be insufficient. OBJECTIVE: To apply the theory of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to derive a mathematical model that links the concentration-time course and the clinical response by means of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter 'area under the effect-time curve' (AUETC), and to use this analysis and clinical data for aminoglycosides to calculate dosage adjustments in renal impairment. METHODS: Model parameters were estimated for the antimicrobial and nephrotoxic effects of aminoglycosides on the basis of data from the literature. Effect parameters were calculated for various degrees of impaired renal function. RESULTS: Use of the model parameters gave a high correlation between the predicted and the observed (literature) values for antimicrobial efficacy and nephrotoxicity. When calculating dosage adjustments in renal impairment, it was possible to hold only one effect (antimicrobial or nephrotoxic) constant by dosage adjustment, whereas the other changed unfavourably. This was explained by differences between the pharmacodynamic parameters for each effect. For high antimicrobial efficacy, a target peak concentration of 9 mg/L (for gentamicin) should be obtained every 48 hours in advanced renal impairment. For low nephrotoxicity, the peak concentration should not exceed 3 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The parameter AUETC could be a useful pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic surrogate marker for dosage adjustment in renal impairment. Using the AUETC method, the beneficial effect can be balanced against the adverse effect.